On June 15, 1215, on the meadow of Runnymede beside the River Thames, King John of England pressed his seal to a long parchment document forced upon him by his rebellious barons: the Magna Carta — the “Great Charter.” John, by contemporaries’ near-universal account a cruel and faithless ruler, had lost Normandy to France, levied ruinous taxes to finance his wars and quarreled with the Pope to the point of England’s excommunication. Facing armed revolt, he agreed to the charter’s sixty-three clauses: protections for church rights, limits on feudal payments, standardized justice for free men — and, in clause 39, the seed of everything that followed: “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.” For the first time in English history, a king had formally acknowledged that he was subject to law. June 15, 1215 is the closest thing the common-law world has to a constitutional birthday.
The Tyrant and the Rebellion
John Lackland — youngest son of Henry II, brother and successor to Richard the Lionheart — inherited a crown in 1199 and spent sixteen years squandering it. He lost the Angevin empire’s continental lands to Philip Augustus of France by 1204, drained England with scutage and tallage to fund a doomed counteroffensive, and drove the Church into interdict from 1208 to 1213 in a fight over the archbishopric of Canterbury that ended with England a papal fief. By 1214, after the catastrophic defeat at Bouvines ended his hopes of reconquest, the barons — armed, organized and citing Henry I’s old coronation charter as precedent — confronted him. They took London in May 1215; on June 15, at Runnymede, the charter was sealed — not signed, as popular memory has it; medieval kings sealed, they did not sign. John had no intention of honoring it: he appealed to Pope Innocent III, who annulled the charter within ten weeks, and civil war — the First Barons’ War — erupted within months. John died of dysentery in October 1216, and the charter was reissued, modified, by his nine-year-old son’s regents as a peace offering.
Clause 39 and the Common Law
Magna Carta was a feudal peace treaty, not a democratic manifesto — its guarantees ran to free men, a small minority, and its first concern was baronial inheritance and wardship. But its procedural genius outgrew its origins. Clause 39’s promise of judgment by “the law of the land” evolved, through reissues in 1216, 1217 and 1225, into the phrase “due process of law” — a concept English jurists carried into the law of habeas corpus, into the Petition of Right (1628) and the Bill of Rights (1689), and across the Atlantic into the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. When Sir Edward Coke argued against the Stuart kings in the seventeenth century, it was Magna Carta he wielded; when the American revolutionaries listed their grievances, they quoted Coke’s Magna Carta; when the Supreme Court reads due-process rights into modern cases, the chain of citation ends at Runnymede. The myth and the law grew up together.
The Document That Refused to Die
Of the original 1215 issue, four copies survive — two at the British Library, one at Lincoln Cathedral, one at Salisbury Cathedral. The charter was confirmed by successive kings over forty times through the Middle Ages, becoming less a treaty than a touchstone: the document English rebels waved, English parliaments cited and English monarchs swore to uphold. Its physical survival is itself a story: the Lincoln copy was hidden during the Civil War, displayed at the New York World’s Fair in 1939, and sheltered in Fort Knox during the Second World War alongside the Declaration of Independence. In 2007, a 1297 version sold at auction for 21.3 million dollars — the most expensive document ever sold at the time — to the founder of the Carlyle Group, who lent it to the National Archives in Washington, where it now faces the Declaration it helped inspire.
Legacy
Eight hundred and eleven years after June 15, 1215, Magna Carta is simultaneously the most overrated and the most consequential document of the Middle Ages — a failed peace treaty whose language outlived every party to it. Its genuine legacy is procedural: the idea that power is lawful only when exercised through law, and that there exist limits which even a king must observe. The barons of 1215 were defending their rents; the world they accidentally founded defends everyone else’s rights. In the United States, where lawyers and judges invoke it constantly, it is cited more often than any other medieval text; in Britain, its anniversary is marked at Runnymede, where the American Bar Association maintains a memorial. The seal pressed in the meadow that June day cracked the oldest principle of power — that the king is the law — and replaced it with the charter’s own: that the law is the king.
Leave a Reply